HS ABSCESSES: I&D VS PUNCH DEBRIDEMENT
NCT06731309 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 72
Last updated 2024-12-12
Summary
This randomized-control trial is designed to determine the recurrence rate of HS abscesses following drainage via two methods: I\&D with a linear incision and PD with an 8mm punch biopsy. In this context, recurrence is a newly described HS abscess adjacent to or within the previously operated area, for which a second intervention is deemed necessary. We hypothesize that PD may yield a more favorable recurrence rate. In addition to comparing recurrence rates, this randomized-control trial will also evaluate postprocedural pain, the occurrence and type of complications, and patients' quality of life associated with both procedures. These additional factors are crucial in assessing the overall effectiveness and patient satisfaction associated with each method, further informing the potential establishment of PD as the new gold standard for draining small, painful, acute HS abscesses.
Conditions
- Hidradenitis Suppurativa (Acne Inversa)
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Punch Debridement
A punch biopsy tool is positioned over the inflamed follicular unit, and a small circle of skin (4 to 8 mm in diameter) is excised. A firm twisting motion is necessary to ensure adequately deep excision.
- PROCEDURE
-
Incision and Drainage
Incision and Drainage is a minimally invasive surgical procedure often employed for the treatment of intensely painful, tense, and fluctuant abscesses that are too deep to drain spontaneously. After administration of a broad circumferential local anesthetic, a small linear incision is made using a standard scalpel blade. Digital pressure is applied to expel the fluid collection. Saline rinses can be used to flush out the remaining contents. This method offers instant pain relief, commonly performed in acute settings by dermatologists, emergency department physicians and general practitioners
Sponsors & Collaborators
- lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2026-04-30
- Completion
- 2027-04-30
Countries
- Netherlands
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Suturing and Packing of Drained Abscesses
NCT00465049 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Incision and Drainage Versus Needle Aspiration in Soft Tissue Abscesses
NCT01085929 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Mid-line Excision Versus Karydakis Operation for Pilonidal Sinus
NCT00412659 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Quality of Life After Wide Surgical Excision in Patients With Hidradenitis Suppurativa
NCT02593604 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Needle Aspiration and Open Incision and Drainage for Cutaneous Abscesses
NCT01186900 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Loop and Primary Incision&Drainage Techniques in the Emergency Department
NCT02286479 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hidradenitis Suppurativa Wound Care
NCT04354012 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Loop Drainage Versus Incision and Drainage for Abscesses in Children
NCT02443272 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Loop Drainage: Effectiveness in Treating Cutaneous Abscesses
NCT02697279 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Wound Packing After Superficial Skin Abscess Drainage
NCT00746109 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Wound Dressings for Hidradenitis Suppurativa
NCT04194541 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of Abscess Drainage Techniques
NCT02545946 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Minimally Invasive Treatments for Pilonidal Disease: LA POPA Trial (Laser And Pit-picking OR Pit-picking Alone)
NCT06140199 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Abdominal aBscess Catheter Sclerotherapy (ABCS)
NCT06906029 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Pilonidal Disease Wound Healing Study
NCT01857128 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Irrigation Versus no Irrigation for Cutaneous Abscess
NCT01606657 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Laying Open and Sinus Excision of Pilonidal Sinus - a Randomized Study
NCT00997048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sorbact TM: Effect of a Microbial Binding Dressing on Wound Healing After Pilonidal Sinus Excision
NCT02011802 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pelashield™ PainGuard™ vs Restrata® in HS Surgery
NCT07316192 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Incision and Loop Drainage Utilizing a Novel Technique for Management of Cutaneous Abscess in an Adult Population
NCT04241471 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Study in Laser Treatment of Pilonidal Cysts
NCT07314632 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Debridement and Laser Ablation Versus Debridement Alone in Pilonidal Disease
NCT05569135 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Management of Periappendicular Abscess
NCT01283815 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Pilonidal Excision Versus Endoscopic Surgery
NCT03923621 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Powered Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Open Technique for Pilonidal Disease
NCT03483480 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA