A Comparison of Techniques for Treating Skin Abscesses
NCT01897675 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 233
Last updated 2018-04-06
Summary
Management of abscesses traditionally involves incision and drainage (I\&D). Abscesses are frequently are "packed" or stented open with the presence of a wick, and traditional care requires re-visits every 2-3 days to have the packing removed and replaced, until finally the abscess cavity has closed, usually 1-2 weeks after initial presentation.
Recently there have been attempts to employ less invasive techniques for abscess management. One novel technique, "loop drainage", has been reported in case reports/case series for management of a variety of types of abscesses in the surgical subspecialty literature.
We propose to conduct a randomized prospective study comparing the efficacy of the loop drainage technique with the traditional incision and drainage technique of abscess management.
Patients presenting to the main or urgent care areas of the Emergency Department at Boston Medical Center for treatment of an abscess will be considered for enrollment as potential subjects. After the treating clinician identifies the patient as an appropriate subject, a Research Associate (RA) will approach the patient and obtain written informed consent to enroll in the study. The subject will then be randomized to the management arm of either loop drainage or traditional I\&D. The clinician will fill out a data sheet describing the abscess characteristics, and then perform either loop drainage or incision and drainage, depending on randomization and the subject will fill out a satisfaction survey. Fourteen days after initial visit, subjects will return for follow-up. The subject will fill out a satisfaction survey, and a study investigator blinded to the treatment group will assess the subject for abscess resolution, cosmetic outcome, number of follow-up visits, and complications.
The study investigators will then compare outcomes between the two study groups.
Conditions
- Cutaneous Abscess
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Incision and Drainage with packing (wick) placement
- PROCEDURE
-
Abscess drainage with loop placement
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Boston Medical Center
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Elissa Schechter-Perkins, MD, MPH · Boston Medical Center
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2017-03-31
- Completion
- 2017-03-09
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Loop Drainage Versus Incision and Drainage for Abscesses in Children
NCT02443272 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Packing Versus no Packing for Cutaneous Abscess
NCT02822768 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Blinded Trial of Abscess Management With Packing vs No Packing
NCT01698996 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Incision and Drainage Versus Needle Aspiration in Soft Tissue Abscesses
NCT01085929 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Incision and Loop Drainage Utilizing a Novel Technique for Management of Cutaneous Abscess in an Adult Population
NCT04241471 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of Abscess Drainage Techniques
NCT02545946 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Loop Drainage Versus Incision and Drainage for Abscesses
NCT03911518 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Abscess Aspiration
NCT04127071 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Suturing and Packing of Drained Abscesses
NCT00465049 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Irrigation Versus no Irrigation for Cutaneous Abscess
NCT01606657 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Needle Aspiration and Open Incision and Drainage for Cutaneous Abscesses
NCT01186900 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Packing Versus no Packing in Perianal Abscess
NCT07280962 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Management of Periappendicular Abscess
NCT01283815 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Aquacel Versus Iodoform Gauze for Filling Abscess Cavity Following Incision and Drainage
NCT00984022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Cost-utility Analysis Treatment of Bartholin's Abscess : Word Catheter Versus Incision-drainage.
NCT04093310 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
HS ABSCESSES: I&D VS PUNCH DEBRIDEMENT
NCT06731309 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Simple Puncture Compared to the Incision of an Abscess on the PiLOnidal Sinus
NCT06378918 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Wound Irrigation With Irrisept on Abscess Healing (Irrisept UF Study)
NCT04957732 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Vacuum Assisted Closure in Neck Abscess
NCT02102685 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Treatment of Abdominal Abscesses With or Without Fibrinolysis
NCT01597336 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Packing of Perianal Abscess Cavities Trial: A Randomised Multicentre Trial Comparing Packing With Non-packing of the Abscess Cavity
NCT01739478 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Needle-Aspirated Compression Dressing Following Ostomy Reversal
NCT03703661 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
De-roofing and Curettage vs WLE for Pilonidal Abscess
NCT03415347 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Primary Fascial Closure Rate in Patients With Open Abdomen Treated With Abthera Versus Barker Technique
NCT02952976 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison Between Laying Open and Sinus Excision of Pilonidal Sinus - a Randomized Study
NCT00997048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA