MedTrace Logo

Urethral Mobilisation Versus Mathieu Technique for Repair of Distal Hypospadias

NCT06705699 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2024-11-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this research is to compare the surgical outcomes of urethral mobilization and the Mathieu technique in treating distal penile hypospadias. The study will evaluate complication rates such as fistula formation and meatal stenosis, assess functional outcomes related to urinary stream quality, and analyze cosmetic results including the appearance of the neomeatus. Ultimately, the goal is to provide evidence-based guidance for choosing the most appropriate technique to optimize surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Conditions

  • Hypospadias Repair Surgery

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Urethral mobilisation

Involves mobilizing the urethral tube proximally and advancing it distally to the glans. The urethra is repositioned and sutured at the neomeatal position.

PROCEDURE

Mathieu

Utilizes a perimeatal-based flap, which is flipped up to create the neourethra.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • ibrahim farag, prof · Assiut University

  • tarek hassan, prof · assuit

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
6 Months
Max Age
7 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-11-25
Primary Completion
2027-11-01
Completion
2027-12-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06705699 on ClinicalTrials.gov