MedTrace Logo

Clipped Versus Handsewn Arteriovenous Fistula Anastomosis

NCT01669850 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 38

Last updated 2015-09-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether handsewn anastomosis versus clipped technique is associated with more complications, fistula failures, surgical cost and surgical time.

Conditions

  • Arteriovenous Fistula Complications and Failure

Interventions

DEVICE

Clipped anastomosis

The vascular clip devise will be used to complete the anastomosis during fistula creation.

PROCEDURE

Handsewn anastomosis

a handsewn anastomosis technique will be used during fistula creation.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Gundersen Lutheran Health System

    collaborator OTHER

  • Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Clark A Davis, MD · Gundersen Lutheran Health System

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-08-31
Primary Completion
2014-12-31
Completion
2014-12-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01669850 on ClinicalTrials.gov