Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia and Erector Spinae Plane Block in Critically Adult Patients Undergoing Femur Surgery

NCT06652334 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2025-06-03

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this observational study is to compare the regional anesthetic methods (not including general anesthesia) -spinal anesthesia, erector spinae plane (ESP) block- which are in routine practice in critically ill adult patients operated for femur fracture, in terms of intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics and clinical course, postoperative intensive care unit stay and hospitalization durations, pain scores, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.

Participants will undergo either spinal anesthesia or erector spinae plane block.

Conditions

  • Femoral Fractures

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Spinal anesthesia

20 patients undergoing spinal anesthesia

PROCEDURE

Erector spinae plane block

20 patients undergoing erector spinae plane block

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Duzce University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Özlem Ersoy Karka, Ass. Prof. · Düzce University Faculty of Medicine

Eligibility

Min Age
65 Years
Max Age
100 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-10-20
Primary Completion
2025-06-01
Completion
2025-06-01

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06652334 on ClinicalTrials.gov