Comparing Double VS Quadruple Flap for Securing Ball Implants After Eye Ball Evisceration
NCT06636630 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2024-10-10
Summary
The primary objective of this interventional study is to compare the efficacy and outcomes of the double flap and quadruple flap closure techniques in securing ball implants after evisceration. Specific objectives include:
1. Assessing the rate of implant migration and extrusion.
2. Evaluating the long-term stability of the implant within the scleral shell.
3. Investigating the occurrence of complications such as exposure or infection.
4. Analyzing the functional and anatomical outcomes of the closure techniques.
5. Comparing patient satisfaction and quality of life measures.
Conditions
- Evisceration; Traumatic, Eye
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Quadruple scleral flap
Quadruple Flap Technique (Group B) A 360-degree peritomy will be performed to expose the underlying sclera. Following evisceration of the ocular contents, careful hemostasis will be achieved. Four muscular-tendinous flaps will be developed from the recti muscles. These flaps will be dissected under minimal tension to preserve their vascular supply. The prepared flaps will be draped over the implant in a manner that the edges slightly overlap, ensuring complete coverage. The flaps will be sutured together using silk sutures, securing the implant in place.The conjunctiva will be meticulously closed over the muscle flaps with continuous absorbable sutures to enhance the healing process and minimize postoperative discomfort.
- PROCEDURE
-
Double scleral flap
The double flap technique, which involves the creation of two scleral flaps to encase and secure the implant, has been a standard approach in many surgical settings. This method aims to cover the implant adequately, thereby minimizing exposure risks and enhancing the potential for implant motility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Fayoum University Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-07-31
- Completion
- 2024-07-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
The Efficacy of a 6-point Transscleral Suture Fixation of a 3-looped Haptics PC-IOL Implantation Through Scleral Pockets for Surgical Management for Microspherophakia
NCT04447157 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Dryness Difference Between Before and After Phacoemulsification
NCT06513000 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Macular Buckle With Three-armed Silicone
NCT02169635 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Corneal Edema After Phacoemulsification
NCT03689270 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Extraction Routes of Intraocular Foreign Body
NCT05966545 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Hydrodynamic Parameters on Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss After Phacoemulsification
NCT00370955 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of In-the-bag Stability Between Single-piece and Three-piece Intraocular Lens
NCT02609997 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dry Eye in Upper Eyelid Surgery: Muscle Versus Fat Removal
NCT06985264 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss After Trabeculectomy Versus Phakotrabeculectomy
NCT03107000 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Modified Orbital Implantation Technique in Enucleation
NCT01207713 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Impact of Cataract Surgery on Keratoplasty Graft Survival
NCT02875145 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Two Phacoemulsification-methods: HF EasyTip 2.2mm vs. HF EasyTip 2.8mm
NCT01936740 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Capsular Tension Ring With Hydeophilic Intraocular Lesnes to Decrease Posterior Capsule Opacification Versus Hydrophobic Ones
NCT06974578 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Corneal Endothelium After Phacoemulsification in Pseudo Exfoliation Syndrome
NCT05447130 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early Vitrectomy for Endophthalmitis After Cataract Surgery
NCT05249413 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Before and After Cataract Surgery
NCT03276182 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Outcomes Between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted and Conventional Phacoemulsification in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy Patients With Cataracts
NCT06966167 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Effectiveness and Safety of 25-Gauge Needle-Assisted Phacoemulsification of Dislocated Intravitreal Lens Nucleus
NCT06709378 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Deep Topical Fornix Nerve Block Versus Topical Anaesthesia Procedure
NCT02196441 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Newly Modified Technique for Levator Muscle Tucking in Blepharoptosis Surgery: An Egyptian Tertiary Center Study
NCT04883853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Phacoemulsification-methods: EasyTip 2.2mm vs. Infusion Assisted EasyTip 2.2mm
NCT01936727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Phacoemulsification-methods: Low Fluidic EasyTip 2.2mm vs. High Fluidic EasyTip 2.2mm
NCT01936714 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Modification of Scleral Suture Fixation of Dislocated IOL
NCT04150263 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Torsional Handpiece to Conventional Handpiece During Routine Phacoemulsification
NCT00366405 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Phaco-UCP Versus Phaco Alone for OAG and Cataract
NCT04430647 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA