High Frequency Jet Ventilation Versus Conventional Positive Pressure Ventilation for EBUS

NCT06537388 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 428

Last updated 2025-05-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is frequently used in pneumology for diagnostic procedures like mediastinal biopsies. This procedure is usually done under general anesthesia. Different methods of ventilation are used according to center and physician preferences. In this retrospective study, complications of 2 types of ventilation will be analyzed:

* High frequency jet ventilation (HFJV)
* Conventional intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) Descriptive statistics will be used to present the data. Both ventilation techniques will be compared after propensity score matching. For HFJV patients from 2019 will be analyzed and for IPPV patients from 2023, as the team changed its practice over time.

Conditions

  • Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation
  • High-Frequency Jet Ventilation
  • Ultrasonography, Interventional

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Ventilation type

Type of ventilation used during the EBUS procedure, either HFJV or IPPV

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Erasme University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-08-15
Primary Completion
2025-03-30
Completion
2025-05-01

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06537388 on ClinicalTrials.gov