Readers' Attention of Shorter Versus Longer Abstracts of Systematic Reviews
NCT06525805 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 1941
Last updated 2024-11-08
Summary
The present randomized controlled trial (RCT) was designed to investigate the perceptions of researchers on systematic review (SR) abstracts. The primary objective will be to compare readers' attention of shorter versus longer abstracts. The secondary objective will be to assess the perception of an abstract based on four indicators of a well-written abstract: (a) Informativeness, (b) Accuracy, (c) Attractiveness, and (d) Conciseness.
The study will involve researchers from all over the world who recently published an SR, regardless of their research field. To identify eligible authors, a search of MEDLINE (via PubMed) was conducted on May 5, 2024, for systematic reviews published between January 1, 2024, and March 26, 2024. A total of at least 6200 SRs will be selected from PubMed and assessed for eligibility. The corresponding author information will be extracted from all included SRs and randomized in a 1:1 ratio.
Conditions
- Researchers Attention
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Long Abstract
The intervention and control group will be provided with a structured abstract of the review by Soderberg et al., entitled "Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones". This review was published once in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and once in the journal BJU International. The length of the abstract differs significantly depending on the journal. The participants assigned to this study arm will be presented with the longer version published in the Cochrane Database, comprising 771 words (PMID: 37955353).
- OTHER
-
Short Abstract
The participants assigned to this study arm will be presented with the shorter version published in BJU International, comprising 277 words (PMID: 37942649).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Oldenburg
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-09-30
- Completion
- 2024-09-30
Countries
- Germany
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Impact of a Limitation Section on the Meta-analysis Results' Interpretation
NCT01848600 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Readability Improvements on the Comprehension of Written Information Given to Clinical Trial Patients: a RCT
NCT00908557 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Testing for the Presence of Authorship Bias in Peer Review
NCT02739737 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Expansion of Abbreviations and Acronyms for Patients
NCT05297942 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Different Frames of Numerical Information in Cochrane Plain Language Summaries
NCT03554252 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Evaluation of a CONSORT Based Online Writing Tool
NCT02127567 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Coordinated Assessment of Notifications of Trials Containing Overt Published Errors
NCT01901523 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Make a Journal Feel as if it Was Mailed Back From the Future
NCT02508051 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomised Study Within a Review (SWAR) to Compare Communication of the Findings of Systematic Reviews to the Public by Plain Language Summary or Video Abstract
NCT07333924 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Impact of Narrative Medicine (Workshop Reflexive Writing)
NCT01798069 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Narrative Medicine (Workshop Reading Diaries)
NCT01798290 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Interpretation of Health News Items Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials With or Without Spin by English-speaking Patients
NCT03095586 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating the Impact of Assessing During Peer Review the CONSORT Checklist Submitted by Authors
NCT03751878 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RCT Assessing the Impact of Online Training on Doctors' Prescribing for Older Patients
NCT02405975 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Testing the Effect of Press Guides on Health Journalists
NCT00938938 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Community Members as Reviewers of Medical Journal Manuscripts
NCT03432143 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of a Neutral Formulated and Designed Package Insert on Nocebo-effect.
NCT03428035 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Research Participants Perceptions of Their Experience in Clinical Studies
NCT00729534 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Testing New Formats for the Presentation of Research Evidence to Health Care Managers and Policy Makers
NCT03041454 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Elaboration and Feedback for Clinical Reasoning Training
NCT05585892 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Blogshot Formats With Standard Cochrane Plain Language Formats
NCT03542201 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Contacting Authors to Retrieve Individual Patient Data
NCT02569411 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Targeted Feedback Reports to Improve Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) Care
NCT00952250 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
An E-health Letter Intervention for Caregivers
NCT05882461 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Diagnostic Time-Out: A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Checklist to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy
NCT01868659 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA