MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Nerve-sparing Techniques in Radical Prostatectomy for Oncological Outcome and Functional Recovery.

NCT06524219 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 150

Last updated 2024-08-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To evaluate the difference among three nerve-sparing techniques(unilateral intrafascial resection, bilateral intrafascial resection, bilateral extrafascial resection) of oncological outcome and functional recovery.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

unilateral intrafascial resection

Conducting unilateral intrafascial resection in Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

PROCEDURE

bilateral intrafascial resection

Conducting bilateral intrafascial resection in Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

PROCEDURE

bilateral extrafascial resection

Conducting bilateral extrafascial resection in Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Pengfei Shao, chief physician · The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-10-01
Primary Completion
2029-10-01
Completion
2029-10-01

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06524219 on ClinicalTrials.gov