Pelvic Congestion Syndrome Post Tubal Ligation Versus Salpingectomy Performed During Caesarean Section
NCT06509425 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 64
Last updated 2024-07-19
Summary
Permanent tubal sterilization during Caesarean section is a reliable method of contraception. It is done either by bilateral tubal ligation or bilateral salpingectomy according to surgeon's preference.
Studies revealing bilateral salpingectomy has an added benefit of primary prevention of ovarian cancer has encouraged surgeons to perform bilateral salpingectomy rather than tubal ligation as a risk reducing surgery owing to the acceptance of fallopian tubes as the origin of high grade serous ovarian cancer.
Another aspect to take into consideration is the post tubal ligation syndrome as it severely affects the quality of life. Diagnosis is based on clinical picture, imaging, and exclusion of other causes of chronic pelvic pain. Women experience dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, menstrual irregularities, and pelvic pain. The gold standard is venography; however, the first choice for initial evaluation is duplex ultrasound.
In this study, we assess impact of bilateral salpingectomy versus tubal ligation in terms of pelvic congestion by participant's symptoms and ultrasound findings
Conditions
- Pelvic Congestion Syndrome
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
salpingectomy during caesarean section
Salpingectomy will be done by clamping, division and ligation using adsorbable suture material (2-0 Vicryl) and excising the tube till it's isthmic part by scissors.
- PROCEDURE
-
tubal ligation during caesarean section
Tubal ligation will be done by Parkland technique. An opening is made in an avascular section of the mesosalpinx by electrocautery. Two absorbable suture ties (2-0 Vicryl) are passed through the opening and used to ligate the proximal and distal ends of the segment (at least 2 cm) which will get excised by scissors.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 30 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-05-21
- Primary Completion
- 2024-09-30
- Completion
- 2024-09-30
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Prophylactic Occlusion Balloons of Both Internal Iliac Arteries in Caesarean Hysterectomy for PASD
NCT06356493 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prophylactic Bilateral Salpingectomy and Laparoscopic Myomectomy
NCT01929148 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ovarian Reserve Following Bilateral Salpingectomy Versus Tubal Ligation During Cesarean Section
NCT02377128 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single or Double-layer Uterine Closure Techniques
NCT03629028 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Salpingectomy During Conservative Hysterectomy
NCT01628432 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Approach Closure Complications
NCT05960292 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between 2 Techniques for Bilateral Salpingectomy
NCT03788421 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Early vs Late Bladder Dissection During CS Hysterectomy in Patients With PAS With Bladder Invasion
NCT05752513 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy in Women With Endometrial Neoplasia
NCT03698604 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conservative Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum
NCT06253832 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ovarian Reserve Modification After Lps Hysterectomy With Bilateral Salpingectomy
NCT02086344 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Abdominal Pectopexy Versus Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy.
NCT04856709 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Conservative Management for PAS Pilot
NCT05139498 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy of a Temporary Sub-Placental Uterine Tourniquet in Minimizing Intraoperative Blood Loss in Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder by a Retrograde Cesarean Hysterectomy (Bladder Last)
NCT05936645 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Does Preventive Uterine Artery Occlusion During Laparoscopic Myomectomy Impact on Ovarian Reserve Markers?
NCT02563392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Salpingectomy at Cesarean Delivery for Ovarian Cancer Reduction (SCORE)
NCT02374827 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Total Versus Subtotal Abdominal Hysterectomy at Time of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy
NCT04178473 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ovarian Function After Hysterectomy With or Without Fimbriectomy or Salpingectomy
NCT01782807 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic Subtotal and Total Hysterectomy
NCT05421156 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Tubal Disconnection Versus Laparoscopic Salpingectomy in Infertile Patients
NCT06015698 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Vaginal Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology
NCT03187327 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prophylactic Salpingectomy for the Prevention of the Ovarian Cancer: Comparison Between Surgical Techniques
NCT02086370 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve
NCT02284711 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Vaginal Vault Suspension During Benign Hysterectomy. A Questionnaire and Register-based Study.
NCT02859272 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Myomectomy During Cesarean Section
NCT03095014 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1