MedTrace Logo

Dural Puncture Epidural Anesthesia Versus Traditional Spinal Anesthesia for Rigid Cystoscopy

NCT06507397 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 76

Last updated 2024-07-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The main objective of this study was to determine if the dural puncture epidural (DPE) anesthesia provides superior analgesia and better patient satisfaction when compared to traditional spinal anesthesia for rigid cystoscopy.

Conditions

  • Dural Puncture Epidural Anesthesia
  • Spinal Anesthesia
  • Rigid Cystoscopy

Interventions

DRUG

hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl

Patients received 3ml hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% combined with 25 microg of fentanyl.

DRUG

plain bupivacaine and fentanyl

Patients received 15 mL mixture of (0.25% plain bupivacaine and 50 µg fentanyl) over 5 minutes, injected in the epidural space by epidural catheter at L3-L4 interspace, a dural puncture was created by the spinal needle. Braun's Espocan® combined spinal epidural kit before insertion of epidural catheter (needle-through-needle technique) but intrathecal medication administration was withheld.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Tanta University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-10-01
Primary Completion
2024-03-01
Completion
2024-03-01

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06507397 on ClinicalTrials.gov