Optimizing the Management of Sickle Cell Patients on Hydroxyurea: The Value of Therapeutic Pharmacological Monitoring

NCT06464458 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2025-02-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Brief Summary: \* A short description of the clinical study, including a brief statement of the clinical study's hypothesis, written in language intended for the lay public.

Limit: 5000 characters.

Severe forms of sickle cell syndrome are characterized by the occurrence of repeated vaso-occlusive crises (CVO), early complications and a high morbidity and mortality in these patients. Intensified management is then required, with the introduction of hydroxyurea treatment and then, if it proves ineffective, a transfusion program or even a haematopoietic stem cell allograft. These latter treatments present significant risks of adverse effects for the patient (haemochromatosis, erythrocyte alloimmunisation for the transfusion program, risk of GVH, chemotherapy-related toxicity, MVO for the allograft).

Hydroxyurea (HU) is the first treatment based on the specific pathophysiology of sickle cell disease. It is the first line of therapeutic intensification for adult patients and children (age ≥ 2 years) with major sickle cell disease. By mainly increasing the percentage of fetal haemoglobin (HbF), HU decreases the frequency of CVO, complications, hospitalizations and prolongs the life expectancy of patients.

The initial dose of HU, recommended by the ANSM, is 15 mg/kg/d once daily. However, the optimal dose cannot be predicted at the start of treatment, which is why a dosage adjustment is essential. The usual dose is between 15 and 35 mg/kg per day.

Typically, the dose is increased every 3 months until a mild myelosuppression tolerated by the patient is reached, indicating that the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has been reached. When the dose of HU has reached the MTD, the ratio of clinical (reduced frequency of vaso-occlusive attacks) and biological (better % of HbF) benefits to risk (toxicity) is optimal for the patient.

The disadvantages of this practice are that:

* dose escalation can be long (9-12 months)
* clinicians may be reluctant to escalate HU to MTD
* patients are treated sub-optimally during the therapeutic adaptation period.

Recent work has shown that it is beneficial for the patient to adjust the initial dose using a pharmacological therapeutic approach in addition to monitoring haematological tolerance.

Thus, by customizing the dose of HU using an area under the curve (AUC) measurement at the initial intake of HU at a standardized dose (20 mg/kg/day), the MTD would be achieved in a faster time frame of 6-9 months.

The primary objective of our trial is to identify the methodology that will most effectively decrease the time to reach the MTD (therapeutic target). The immediate benefit will be a reduction in CVO which is the major clinical problem and leads to a risk of complications in sickle cell disease.

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

management on hydroxyurea by therapeutic pharmacological monitoring

HU dose adaptation according: * HU AUC with a target AUC and subject to haematological tolerance. * T2H (at V2, V3, V4), subject to haematological tolerance.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Paillard · University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
2 Years
Max Age
35 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-02-08
Primary Completion
2025-08-07
Completion
2025-08-07

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06464458 on ClinicalTrials.gov