MedTrace Logo

A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Versus Conventional Midline Approach for Lumbar Puncture

NCT06418841 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 84

Last updated 2024-05-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of CMPAT and MAT in patients undergoing LP. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the CMPAT treatment group (group A) or the MAT treatment group (group B). Researchers will compare CMPAT treatment group and the MAT treatment group to see if the number of needle insertion attempts required for a successful LP, the puncture success rate, pain assessment in the back, head, and legs, and the occurrence of complications have different.

Conditions

  • Spinal Puncture

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Technique

Computer-Assisted Paramedian Approach Technique

PROCEDURE

Conventional Midline Approach Technique

Conventional Midline Approach Technique

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
99 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-10-28
Primary Completion
2025-10-28
Completion
2025-10-28

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06418841 on ClinicalTrials.gov