MedTrace Logo

Smart-phone Application Versus Conventional Paper for the Documentation of Voiding Dysfunction in Children

NCT06404996 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2024-05-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The objective of the research is to compare the written voiding diary method to the smart-phone diary, DryDawn®, which the investigators selected among several applications using specific criteria appropriate to our population. The investigators aim is to describe the method that proves to be most efficient by assessing which diary provides the best quality and amount of information, and draws the highest level of satisfaction from participants.

Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a questionnaire that was designed for use in this study.

Conditions

  • Voiding Dysfunction
  • Children

Interventions

DEVICE

Smart-phone Voiding Diary

Smart-phone Voiding Diary

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Paper voiding diary

Conventional Paper voiding diary

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • King Abdullah International Medical Research Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Amr Hodhod, MD, PhD, Msc · King Abdullah International Medical Research Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
6 Years
Max Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-08-01
Primary Completion
2025-08-01
Completion
2026-02-28

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06404996 on ClinicalTrials.gov