MedTrace Logo

Comparing Two Anesthetic Techniques for Implant Placement

NCT04395690 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 96

Last updated 2024-07-30

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

To evaluate in a comparative way the patient's perception in implant surgery in the posterior mandibular quadrants depending on whether the operation is performed under trunk anaesthesia or infiltrative anaesthesia, in both cases with Articaine.

Randomized and multicenter prospective study to be developed in eight centers with similar socio-professional characteristics, with the same operative protocol.

A significant sample of patients will be randomized to undergo the same intervention (surgery to place implants in the posterior mandible) under one or another type of anesthesia (inferior alveolar block nerve or infiltrative) and data will be collected using a Numerical Rate scale on four occasions (after the incision, after drilling, after suturing and after 12h).

Conditions

  • Edentulous Jaw
  • Dental Implant
  • Anesthesia, Local

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Dental Implant Placement in the posterior mandible

Surgery done in the posterior mandible with missing teeth for placing dental implants.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Aula Dental Avanzada

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Guillem Esteve-Pardo, DDS · Aula Dental Avanzada

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2019-01-04
Primary Completion
2021-07-01
Completion
2021-07-01

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04395690 on ClinicalTrials.gov