Comparison of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using Double Loaded Grand Knot Technique Versus Double Loaded Knotted Suture Anchor

NCT06394609 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2024-05-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Arthroscopic surgery is the preferred method to fix a Bankart lesion (tears in the labrum) and has better patient outcomes. It\'s important to assess any bone loss in the shoulder socket before surgery for a successful outcome. Using suture anchors to reattach the torn tissue is advantageous because it avoids going through the back of the shoulder. The article describes a specific technique for tying the sutures and anchor placement to minimize nerve and artery damage. Design of the suture anchor and how the suture is placed can affect its strength. Using two sutures per anchor (double-loaded) might be just as strong as using three anchors with one suture each (single-loaded), which is more common. This could save cost and bone but needs further study. The study proposes a new surgical technique using double-loaded anchors with more sutures to see if it offers similar strength while reducing implant use.

Conditions

  • Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Interventions

OTHER

double loaded knotted suture anchor

arthroscopic bankart repair by using double loaded knotted suture anchor

OTHER

double grand knot

arthroscopic bankart repair by using double grand knot

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Cairo University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Months
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-12-01
Primary Completion
2023-04-30
Completion
2023-04-30

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06394609 on ClinicalTrials.gov