MedTrace Logo

The Role of Rotator Interval Closure in Bankart Lesion Repair

NCT01620619 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 142

Last updated 2014-04-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The null hypothesis is that there is no statistical difference between the two treatment groups for any outcome. The investigators suspect that patients who undergo a Bankart lesion repair with rotator interval closure will have lower quality of life and less external rotation compared to patients who undergo a Bankart lesion repair alone. No difference will be observed for recurrence rate between the two treatment groups

Conditions

  • Bankart Lesions
  • Anterior Shoulder Instability

Interventions

OTHER

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair alone

Usual arthroscopic Bankart repair

PROCEDURE

Closure of rotator interval

Usual arthroscopic Bankart repair plus rotator cuff interval closure

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Western Ontario, Canada

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Dianne Bryant, PhD · The University of Western Ontario

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
15 Years
Max Age
51 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-02-28
Primary Completion
2016-05-31

Countries

  • Canada

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01620619 on ClinicalTrials.gov