Subarachnoid-Subarachnoid (S-S) Bypass Versus Adhesion Lysis in Spinal Arachnoiditis and Syringomyelia

NCT06375759 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2024-04-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To determine whether Subarachnoid-Subarachnoid (S-S) Bypass results in better patient outcomes with fewer complications and improved quality of life compared to intradural adhesion lysis in individuals with Spinal Arachnoiditis and Syringomyelia.

Conditions

  • Syringomyelia

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Subarachnoid-Subarachnoid (S-S) Bypass

The dura was widely exposed beyond the level of trauma, and then a midline dural opening was made under an operative microscope. When dura and arachnoid were adhered because of an expansion of arachnoiditis, they had to be released with great care to place the bypass tubes. During this procedure, S-S bypass was not usually needed to performed arachnoid lysis. This exposure had to reach the normal arachnoid mater free from arachnoiditis and adhesion, with normal CSF circulation. After dissections of the normal arachnoid mater at the cephalic and caudal sites, 1 or 2 tubes made of medical grade silicone (ventricular drainage tube; internal diameter 1.5-2.0 mm, external diameter 2.5-3.3 mm) were inserted into the cephalic and caudal ends of the normal subarachnoid space. The part of the tube inserted into the subarachnoid space was approximately 2 cm long.

PROCEDURE

Intradural Adhesion Lysis

Intradural spinal cord Adhesion Lysis

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
80 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-04-30
Primary Completion
2025-04-30
Completion
2027-04-30

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06375759 on ClinicalTrials.gov