MedTrace Logo

Conventional Clipping Versus Punching Closure

NCT06350357 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 130

Last updated 2024-04-05

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an important minimally invasive treatment method for early digestive tract tumors, with a high cure rate, and it is widely used in clinical practice. And wound closure after ESD is a great challenge, which is closely related to postoperative perforation bleeding. Clip closure is one of the most commonly used closure methods. However, when the wound is large or when the wound is located more difficult to operate, conventional closure may lead to delayed perforation, and postoperative clips may be prone to early spontaneous shedding. The authors have recently reported a method that may be able to close larger and difficult wounds because the grooves can better fix the metal clips. The latest study suggests that this approach may be safe and effective, but the study has a small sample size and has no controls. Therefore, high-quality clinical study evidence related to punch closure is required in the strategy of defect closure after ESD, in order to better evaluate the feasibility and safety of this new endoscopic closure method.

Conditions

  • the Rate of Complete Closure

Interventions

OTHER

punching closure

The hole clamping and the grooves hold the metal clips better

OTHER

Conventional clipping

Metal lip closure is one of the most commonly used closure methods

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ningbo No. 1 Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-04-01
Primary Completion
2025-12-31
Completion
2025-12-31

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06350357 on ClinicalTrials.gov