Relationship Between Soft Tissue Volume and Gingival Phenotype: a Novel Classification System
NCT06348823 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 56
Last updated 2024-11-22
Summary
Different classifications to describe alveolar ridge defects have been published over the past years but no single classification has been developed concerning soft tissue volume around teeth or dental implants. Moreover, while several studies investigated the effect of various augmentation techniques and materials on soft tissue volume change and volume stability there is a real gap of knowledge regarding how to evaluate the available soft tissue volume and when to consider it sufficient or deficient which would definitely improve clinical decision making and treatment planing. Therefore, our primary aim was to assess the application of a novel classification system based on the correlation between buccal soft tissue volume and gingival biotypes and, also to assess the sensitivity of such novel method.
Conditions
- Gingival Biotype
- Soft Tissue
Interventions
- DIAGNOSTIC_TEST
-
volume survey
All subjects received oral hygiene instructions and, if needed, a dental cleaning of plaque and calculus. After calibration using digital photographs, intraoral scans, and CBCT, one dentist, who was not involved in the screening phase to avoid any bias, obtained all clinical parameters (gingival biotype, probing depth, gingival thickness, gingival width). Two test subjects were examined prior starting with enrollment and data collection.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
British University In Egypt
collaborator OTHER -
Ain Shams University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
AHMED HAMDY MAHMOUD MAHMOUD · British University In Egypt
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-02-25
- Primary Completion
- 2025-06-30
- Completion
- 2025-10-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Volumetric Analysis of Alveolar Ridge Contour Using Sub-epithelial Connective Tissue Graft
NCT04482127 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Dental Implant
NCT06238427 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pontic Site Development Using Soft Tissue Augmentation
NCT03834649 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Xenogenic Collagen Matrix vs. Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Early Maxillary Implants
NCT07024186 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hard and Soft Tissue Changes After Immediate Implant Placement Using Connective Tissue Graft With and Without Bone Grafting in the Esthetic Zone
NCT06592079 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Midfacial Gingival Margin Changes Following Immediate Implants.
NCT05975515 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient-specific Alloplastic Chin Implant Versus Computer Guided Genioplasty: Soft Tissue Assessment After One Year Follow up
NCT04817930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Profile Following Socket Preservation With Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Free Gingival Graft
NCT03628170 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Volumetric Changes of Labial Soft Tissue Contour Following Different Approaches with Immediate Implant Placement
NCT04310449 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
PES After Soft Tissue Augmentation Using CTG Around Immediate Dental Implants Versus Immediate Dental Implants Alone in Esthetic Zone
NCT03425864 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Graft Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix in Preservation of Buccal Plate of Bone
NCT06229561 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Buccal Soft Tissue Contour Changes After Immediate Implant Placement with or Without Connective Tissue Graft
NCT04309006 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Xengenic Cortical Membranes Versus Connective Tissue Graft With Coronally Advanced Flap for the Treatment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Dehiscences: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT06588998 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Treatment of Gingival Recession Using Gingival Composite Restoration Versus Coronally Advanced Flap
NCT04584931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Facial Gingival Level Evaluation Following Soft Tissue Augmentation Using CTG Around Immediate Dental Implants vs Immediate Dental Implants Alone in the Esthetic Zone.
NCT03334994 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Buccal Fat Pad and Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft
NCT04849663 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Soft Tissue Augmentation Using CAF With Either SCTG and Vitamin C Versus SCTG Alone in Management of RT1 Gingival Recession
NCT04632693 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Two Filling Materials for Teeth-tissue Supported Overdenture
NCT06580483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bi-layer Collagen Membrane Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Localized Gingival Recession
NCT07162207 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Pink Esthetic Score
NCT03792425 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Pink Esthetic Score After Using Two Papilla Reconstruction Exposure Techniques Versus Mid-Crestal Sulcular Incision in Second Stage Implant Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trail
NCT06813846 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Periosteal Tissue Graft vs Collagen Matrix for Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Implants: A Comparative Study
NCT06808243 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Soft Tissue Esthetics Around Immediate Implant Using Dual Zone Therapeutic Concept Versus Buccal Gap Fill to Bone Level
NCT03768297 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Healing After Tooth Extraction
NCT06835543 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Evaluation Around Implants Using Prf or a Palatal Pedicle
NCT03224442 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA