Soft Tissue Stability in Immediate Implant Placement Using (VST) Versus Conventional Flap in Type II Extraction Sockets
NCT06324747 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 16
Last updated 2025-08-22
Summary
This study compare between the vestibular socket therapy (VST) and the traditional mucoperiosteal flap reflection in immediate implant placement in type II extraction socket in the esthetic zone.
The technique of vestibular socket therapy (VST), introduced by Elaskry, enables the placement of implants immediately while simultaneously rehabilitating the entire socket, resulting in excellent esthetic and functional outcomes that meet the expectations of patients. VST involves socket augmentation through a minimally invasive vestibular access incision, eliminating the need for the traditional mucoperiosteal flap reflection, regardless of the extent of socket compromise.
Conditions
- Badly Broken Tooth in a Socket Type II Eligible to be Replaced by Immediate Implant
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Vestibular socket therapy
Vestibular socket therapy will be used for the intervention.
- PROCEDURE
-
conventional full thickness flap
reflecting the mucoperiosteum to access the extraction socket
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
British University In Egypt
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Mohamed Shawky, BDS · The British University in Egypt
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 21 Years
- Max Age
- 55 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-10-23
- Primary Completion
- 2024-10-01
- Completion
- 2024-12-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Immediate Implant Placement in Type ii Socket by Vestibular Socket Therapy Using Collagen Membrane
NCT07337837 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of i-PRF Usage in Vestibular Socket Therapy
NCT07304986 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hard and Soft Tissue Changes Following Vestibular Socket Preservation Versus Ice Cream Cone Technique for Management of Defective Fresh Extraction Sockets in the Esthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06435754 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hard and Soft Tissue Changes Following Vestibular Socket Preservation Versus Ice Cream Cone Technique for Management of Defective Fresh Extraction Sockets
NCT06590168 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of the Amount of Root Coverage Following The Use of VISTA Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap in Combination With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for Management of Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT03340987 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Outcomes of Badly Broken-down Teeth Treated With Surgical Extrusion Compared With Immediate Implant Placement
NCT04437797 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Loading With and Without Connective Tissue Graft
NCT03841851 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Esthetic Root Coverage Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft With Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access in Multiple Gingival Recessions
NCT03588052 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Socket Shield Technique In Immediately Placed Implants
NCT06478511 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Outcomes Of Badly Broken-Down Teeth Treated With Orthodontic Extrusion Compared With Immediate Implant Placement
NCT04436094 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) Combined With a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Maxillary Gingival Recessions
NCT06755294 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
To Compare Two Commonly Used Soft Tissue Grafting Techniques to Achieve Coronal Flap Advancement and Root Coverage
NCT03566108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Root Coverage With Connective Tissue Graft Associated With VISTA Versus Tunnel Technique
NCT03690635 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Immediately Placed Implants Using Simvastatin and Autogenous Tooth Graft Combination in Periodontally Compromised Sites
NCT04992416 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Dental Implants in The Upper Anterior Region
NCT06382337 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Dual Zone Approach Versus Connective Tissue Graft
NCT05776498 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Midfacial Gingival Margin Changes Following Immediate Implants.
NCT05975515 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Buccal Fat Pad vs. Palatal Rotation Scarf Grafts for Soft Tissue Management Around Zygomatic Implants
NCT06968780 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Peri Implant Soft Tissue Esthetics With Immediate Temporization With and Without Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft
NCT03770975 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Tissue Flossing Technique on Post Traumatic Elbow Stiffness.
NCT05948423 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
m-VISTA Technique vs. CAF in the Treatment of Class III Multiple Recessions
NCT03258996 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Gelatin Sponge VS PTFE Membrane for Socket Sealing After Immediate Implant Placement
NCT05982353 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Comparison of Using Collagen Membrane and A-PRF Using VISTA Technique in Gingival Recession Treatment
NCT06357351 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of a Ready Made Plastic Stent With Apically Repositioned Flap in Augmentation of the Peri Implant Soft Tissue
NCT03754894 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Using VISTA Technique Compared to MCAF Technique With PRF.
NCT03328442 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA