Progesterone Primed Endometrial Protocol Versus Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol in Assisted Reproductive Treatments

NCT06297564 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2024-03-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes in progesterone primed endometrial protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatments.

Conditions

  • Progesterone Primed Endometrial Protocol
  • Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol
  • Assisted Reproductive Treatments

Interventions

OTHER

Progesterone primed endometrial protocol

The cases were received soft progesterone capsules (brand name: Utrogestan, 100 mg, Laboratories Besins International, France) 100 mg and 150 IU of human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) concomitantly from the menstrual cycle (MC) day 3 until the trigger day.

OTHER

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol

The cases were received the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol consisting of HMG 150 IU's daily injection from MC 3 until the trigger day. GnRH-ant (Cetrotide, 0.25 mg, MerckSerono) was started when at least one of the following criteria were met: LH \>10 IU/L, the presence of at least one follicle with mean diameter \>14 mm, or serum E2 level \>600 pg/mL.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • New Valley University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-09-01
Primary Completion
2024-01-01
Completion
2024-01-01

Countries

  • Egypt

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06297564 on ClinicalTrials.gov