MedTrace Logo

Physical Attendance Versus Telephone or Video Follow-up in Patients With Non-functioning Pituitary Tumors.

NCT06297473 · Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 812

Last updated 2026-01-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the safety of routine telephone assessment versus in-person assessment during a two-year period for patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Secondly, to compare the quality of pituitary care in persons having biochemical assessment once versus twice a year. Thirdly, to assess the rationale of repeated assessment of pituitary function and imaging in patients with small pituitary tumors (microadenomas).

Conditions

  • Non-Functional Pituitary Adenoma

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Telephone-/video follow-up

The yearly routine review of patients takes place by using a telephone or video interview rather than in-person interview in the endocrine outpatient department. All other assessments, e.g. biochemical, MRI, is conducted as usual.

BEHAVIORAL

In-person follow-up

The yearly routine review on patients takes place at the endocrine outpatient department

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Zealand University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jesper Krogh, DMSc · Zealand University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-04-01
Primary Completion
2028-05-01
Completion
2029-08-01

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06297473 on ClinicalTrials.gov