MedTrace Logo

Lipiodol Deposition Using Endhole vs. Pressure-Modulated Delivery

NCT06204159 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 12

Last updated 2025-05-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare CT scan of the coverage of tumors treated with TACE using End Hole catheters to those treated with the TriNav catheter that alters tissue pressure. Both catheters are FDA approved for delivery of TACE.

• Is there a difference in CT appearance with delivery in the type of catheter used during the TACE procedure?

Participants will be asked to undergo a TACE procedure, a CT scan and review of their medical record to compare End Hole and TriNav catheters during TACE procedures.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

TACE Catheters

End Hole and TriNav catheters are FDA approved. This study is comparing the two for chemotherapy delivery during the TACE procedure. This study will randomize which catheter is used for the first TACE procedure and the other catheter will be used for the second TACE procedure

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • TriSalus Life Sciences, Inc.

    collaborator INDUSTRY

  • Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicine

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-02-01
Primary Completion
2026-01-31
Completion
2026-06-30
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06204159 on ClinicalTrials.gov