Comparison of Customized and Standard Total Ankle Prostheses

NCT06193057 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24

Last updated 2025-12-29

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The objective of this study is to compare primary total ankle replacement (TAR) performed with a customized procedure (prostheses customized for each patient based on his or her ankle morphology reconstructed from tomographic scans, and implanted via cutting guides customized for the patient) with standard primary TARs, considering: objective radiological results, subjective patient outcomes, and overall costs of both procedures

Conditions

  • Ankle Osteoarthritis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Total ankle arthroplasty

Patients who underwent ankle prosthesis implantation procedure with an anterior approach were involved in a longitudinal skin incision of about 12-15cm anterior to the tibio-tarsal joint in supine position. Once the deep layers were reached, passing through the anterior tibial tendon and extensor hallucis longus tendon sheath, the tibio-tarsal joint was then exposed. The operator proceeds to astragalic and tibial resections, once the appropriate size of implants was selected, the final components were implanted. In both groups, the basic prosthetic design approach will be 'three-component,' that is, with congruent mobile meniscus interposed between the tibial and astragalic components. At the end of the procedure, orthopedic walker boot was placed for 3 weeks, and progressive weight allowed.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-07-26
Primary Completion
2026-04-30
Completion
2027-04-26

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06193057 on ClinicalTrials.gov