Total Ankle Replacement Versus Arthrodesis Trial

NCT02128555 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 303

Last updated 2021-03-15

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of TARVA is to determine whether Total Ankle Replacement (TAR) provides better clinical outcomes than ankle arthrodesis in patients aged 50-85 years with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis, and compare cost-effectiveness of the two treatments

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Total Ankle Replacement

The joints are resurfaced with metal implants and a mobile plastic liner is placed between them as the gliding surface.

PROCEDURE

Arthrodesis

The remaining damaged cartilage is removed from the ends of the bone and the two bones are then held together in compression using screws, or plates until they join to become one (bone fusion), so that there is no longer any movement at that joint.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

    collaborator OTHER_GOV
  • University College, London

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Andrew Goldberg · Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
50 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2015-01-31
Primary Completion
2019-12-23
Completion
2029-02-28

Countries

  • United Kingdom

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02128555 on ClinicalTrials.gov