Clinical Performance of Flowable Giomer Versus Nanofilled Composite in Conservative Occlusal Cavities
NCT06097143 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 42
Last updated 2025-09-29
Summary
With limited evidence-based information in literature the goal of this clinical trial is to learn about Flowable Giomer and compare it to Nanofilled Flowable Composite in Conservative Occlusal Cavities. It is beneficial to evaluate the newly introduced material using a randomized controlled clinical trial to test the null hypothesis that this new flowable giomer (Shofu™ Beautifil Injectable X, Shofu Dental Corp., Japan) and conventional resin-based nano-filled composite (Filtek™ Z350 XT 3M ESPE, USA) which will then be coated with (Shofu™ PRG Barrier Coat, Shofu Dental Corp., Japan) will have the same clinical performance as flowable resin composite as a preventative restorative restoration in permanent molars.
Conditions
- Occlusal Caries
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Flowable Giomer
Pre-reacted Glass Ionomer (PRG) filler is added to resin to create giomer, a dental adhesive material. Fluoride release and recharge, acid resistance, an anti-plaque effect, dentin remineralization, and acid buffering capacity are some of the benefits of giomer.
- OTHER
-
Flowable Nano-filled composite with S-PRG barrier coat
Flowable composites are claimed to have a higher wetting ability of the tooth surface and thus ensure penetration into all surface irregularities in layers of minimal thickness. As a result of the higher amount of filler particles, it is noted that flowable composites have less porosity than conventional resin-based sealants. Moreover, flowable composite materials have better mechanical properties which lead to increased durability and longevity of the restoration. The PRG Barrier Coat is a resinous coating substance that shields the enamel surface from demineralization brought on by acidic attack. Near the coated surface, S PRG filler ions in PRG Barrier Coat have been found to have an acid-neutralizing effect. F and Sr released by PRG Barrier Coat can be effectively absorbed by the tooth substrate to prevent demineralization thus hindering the progression of caries.
- OTHER
-
Flowable Nano-filled composite
Flowable composites are claimed to have a higher wetting ability of the tooth surface and thus ensure penetration into all surface irregularities in layers of minimal thickness. As a result of the higher amount of filler particles, it is noted that flowable composites have less porosity than conventional resin-based sealants. Moreover, flowable composite materials have better mechanical properties which lead to increased durability and longevity of the restoration.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 19 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-12-15
- Primary Completion
- 2025-06-19
- Completion
- 2025-06-21
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Remineralizing Efficacy of Giomer Varnish vs. Fluoride Varnish in Management of White Spot Lesions in Adult Patients
NCT05306691 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Clinical Performance of Nanohybrid Resin Composite Lined With PRG Barrier Coat Compared to Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Carious Cavities Over 18 Months: Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05605457 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Giomer Based Injectable Resin Composite Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Carious Cavities Over 18-months.
NCT05389163 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction ,Marginal Integrity ,Shade Matching and Gingival Health of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate Bridges Cemented Using Bioactive Cement and Adhesive Resin Cement
NCT03691597 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness RMGI and Giomer, Individually and Combined Anterior Cervical Caries
NCT06901453 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Injection Molding Technique: A Minimally Invasive Management for Enamel Hypoplasia Affecting Permanent Anterior Teeth in Children
NCT06205420 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations in Cervical Carious Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT06185881 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Two Filling Materials for Teeth-tissue Supported Overdenture
NCT06580483 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of High Viscosity Bioactive Injectable Composite in Deep Marginal Elevation
NCT06875544 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Full Coverage Hybrid Ceramic Crowns in the Aesthetic Zone: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07264491 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Computer Guided Placement of Zygomatic Implants in Two Different Approaches
NCT06129695 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Remineralization Potential of Self- Assembling Peptide P11-4 Containing Fluoride Versus Er, Cr: YSGG Laser Treatment and Micro Tensile Bond Strength of Giomer Restoration in Carious Lesions
NCT07065305 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Evaluation of Marginal, Internal Adaptation and Clinical Performance of Endo-crowns Fabricated From Nano Hybrid and Lithium Di-silicate Ceramic Materials.
NCT04737005 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Buccal Fat Pad vs. Palatal Rotation Scarf Grafts for Soft Tissue Management Around Zygomatic Implants
NCT06968780 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Versus Self-Adhesive Resin Composite Restorative Systems
NCT06543680 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Biodentine Versus Glass Ionomer Cement in Treatment of Very Deep Carious Lesions
NCT02868918 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Effectiveness of Bioactive Resin Varnish and Fluoride Containing Xylitol Varnish in Management of Teeth Hypersensitivity
NCT04568473 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Advanced Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Adult Patients With Carious Cervical Lesions After One Year
NCT05617703 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Xenograft With Hydrogel Versus Xenograft Alone in the Socket Preservation After Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT06957197 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Regenerative Ability of Immature Necrotic Permanent Teeth Using Different Scaffolds
NCT06693739 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flapless Immediate Implant Placement With Socket Shield Technique Versus Connective Tissue Graft in Anterior Maxilla
NCT07303374 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of One-step Versus Multistep Polishing Protocol on Class IV Composite Restorations.
NCT06732115 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Subgingival Open Sandwich Restorations
NCT05125900 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Interdental Papilla Reconstruction Using Injectable Autogenous Fat Versus Hyaluronic Acid Filler.
NCT05579522 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft with Socket Shield Technique
NCT06659081 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA