Comparison of VentiBroncTM Anchor With Conventional Double-lumen Endobronchial Tube in Patients With High Risk of Malposition

NCT06061055 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 154

Last updated 2024-12-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators intend to compare the group using triple-cuffed endobronchial tube (VentiBroncTM Anchor) with the group using the conventional double-lumen endotracheal tube (Shiley®) in patients at high risk of malposition of the double-lumen endotracheal tube. The aim of this study is to determine if the use of VentiBroncTM Anchor increases the success rate of optimal double-lumen intubation to left main bronchus.

Conditions

  • Endotracheal Intubation

Interventions

DEVICE

Intubation with VentiBronc Anchor endobronchial double-lumen tube

Patients in this group are intubated with triple-cuffed double-lumen endobronchial tube (VentiBronc Anchor).

DEVICE

conventional double-lumen intubation

Patients in this group are intubated with conventional double-lumen endobronchial tube (Shiley).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Yonsei University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kyuho Lee · Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-10-26
Primary Completion
2024-11-26
Completion
2024-11-26

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06061055 on ClinicalTrials.gov