Lung Ultrasound Score and Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Compared to Pulse Pressure Variation

NCT05980494 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 150

Last updated 2025-03-12

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Evaluation and management of intravascular volume are a central challenge for the critical ill patients. Hypotensive patients are commonly resuscitated with intravenous crystalloid fluid as a recommendation for treatment of many shock states.

There has been a growing interest in the implementation of lung ultrasound in critical care management in the last decade as it is easy, bedside, non-expensive, non invasive and radiation free.

The object of the current study is to assess the ability of lung and inferior vena cava sonography versus pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with circulatory failure on mechanical ventilation.

Conditions

Interventions

DRUG

normal Saline

normal saline cyrstalloids infusion with rate of 4ml/kg /h for 3 hours

DEVICE

lung ultrasound

Lung ultrasound by Philips clear vue350, Philips healthcare, Andover MAO1810, USA, Machine ID:1385 will scan For each hemi-thorax 3 main areas (anterior (Ant), lateral (Lt) and posterior (Post)) marked by the para-sternal, anterior axillary and posterior axillary lines for a total of 28 sectors will be identified

DEVICE

inferior vena cava measurements

The inferior vena cava was explored in the subxiphoid window in its sagittal view-just below the junction between the inferior vena cava and suprahepatic veins which lie approximately 0.5 to 3 cm from the right atrium, following the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines.; The (IVC distensibility index (dIVC) was calculated as (maximum diameter - minimum diameter)/minimum diameter.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

passive leg raising test (PLRT)

Regardless of CVP (i.e., during "blind PLR"), noninvasiveΔPLR systolic arterial pressure (SAP) more than 17% reliably identify fluid responders. During "CVP-guided PLR", in case of sufficient change in CVP (at least of 2 mmHg), noninvasiveΔPLR SAP perform better (cutoff of 9%). These findings, in sedated patients who had already undergone volume expansion and/or catecholamines, have to be verified during the early phase of circulatory failure (before an arterial line).

DEVICE

pulse pressure variation

patients will be temporarily sedated and paralyzed and on fully controlled mechanical ventilation. No spontaneous breathing effort will be detected on the mechanical ventilator waveform monitor ensuring that the respiratory changes in arterial pressure reflected only the effects of positive pressure ventilation. Modes of ventilation is selected to volume or pressure controlled ventilation, depending on the decision of the primary physicians. A tidal volume will be not less than 8 ml/ kg (predicted body weight). The preset respiratory rate will be at 14 breath/min. Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) will be between 8 and 10 cmH2O. The plateau pressure was kept at below 30 cmH2O. In all patients, radial artery cannulation will be done for invasive blood pressure monitoring (using a 20 G cannula), PPV is calculated directly on Nihon Kohden monitores at base line.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Fayoum University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • omar S farghaly, MD · lecturer

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-09-13
Primary Completion
2024-05-20
Completion
2024-06-20

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05980494 on ClinicalTrials.gov