Tunnel Widening in Augmented ACL Integration Via PrP Enriched Collected Autologous Bone vs Standard ACL Technique
NCT05953051 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 107
Last updated 2024-01-29
Summary
The purpose of this clinical study is to compare the outcomes of two surgical techniques for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after a single, primary ACL rupture.
The main question to be answered is:
\- Does less widening of the tibial tunnel occur when a bone/Platelet rich plasma (PrP) composite material is placed directly into the tibial tunnel after fixation of the implant (experimental group) compared to the same surgery without the use of the composite material (control group)?
Participants will be randomized into one of the two groups and they will not know which group they belong to. After 12 months they will undergo CT, MRI, medical examination and functional knee testing. They will have a further medical examination and functional knee testing at 24 months. Patient Reported Outcomes will be collected before surgery, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery.
Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
ACL reconstruction with bone/PrP-composite
During standard ACL reconstruction, the drilled bone debris is collected in a sterile filtered chamber. Then the bone debris is mixed with PrP. After fixation of the graft the composite is inserted into the drilled tunnel at the interface between tendon to bone. The intraarticular aperture sites are sealed by use of fibrin that is previously gathered out of the PrP as well.
- PROCEDURE
-
ACL reconstruction (Standard)
Standard ACL reconstruction with Semitendinosus alone or plus gracilis, femoral fixation via extracortical fixation by adjustable loop device, tibial fixation via a bio-interference screw or adjustable device
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Schulthess Klinik
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Gian Salzmann, Prof. · Schulthess Klinik
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 50 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2026-08-31
- Completion
- 2027-08-31
Countries
- Switzerland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Hybrid Remnant Repair
NCT05494073 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Primary ACL Reconstruction in Patient Over 40 Years: Allograft Versus Autograft
NCT06584838 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Use of an Osteoconductive Scaffold in ACL-Reconstruction
NCT03462823 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
All-Inside Single-Bundle for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Full Thickness of the Peroneus Longus Tendon Compared to the Six-strand-hamstring Autograft (ACL)
NCT05580133 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Autologous Cartilage Implantation vs Arthroscopic Debridement
NCT02636881 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee Joint, by the Method of Stabilization of the Screw With a Bioabsorbable Method, With or Without the Use of Autogenous Spongiform Bone Grafts.
NCT05328544 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Hamstrings Autograft Versus Tibialis Allograft for Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament
NCT00510848 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Does Bone Grafting at the Time of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone ACL Reconstruction Reduce the Incidence of Post-operative Anterior Knee Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
NCT04958733 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ACL Versus ALL + ACL Study
NCT03740022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Obtain Safety and Effectiveness of CT-ACL001, a Regenerative Ligament Using Biological Tissue, in ACLR
NCT07129694 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Analysis of Introperative RegenLab PRP and Hyaluronic Acid in Patients With Knee ACL Tear
NCT04586361 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Multi-scale Modeling for Predictive Characterization of Ligaments and Grafts Behavior in ACL Reconstruction
NCT06058494 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect of PRP Versus BMC in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT05191732 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ACL Reconstruction With Shark Screw® or Biocomposite-interference Screws
NCT06357091 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Internal Brace on Outcomes Following ACL Reconstruction With BTB Autograft
NCT06542705 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Bone-void Filler on Anterior Knee Pain Following ACL Reconstruction
NCT04533880 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cemented vs. Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05616884 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Registry of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions
NCT04135950 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Induced ACL Healing With the Ligamys Technique: a Prospective, Multicenter Observational Case Series
NCT02203214 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Biologic Augmentation With Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
NCT04650568 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Compare Two Techniques for Articular Cartilage Repair:ACIC Vs. MCIC
NCT01984450 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating Cryopreserved Osteochondral Allograft Cores for the Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions in the Knee
NCT06216756 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament(ACL-R) in the 30+-Year Old Assessed by Patient Reported Outcome Measures(PRO) Using the Nationwide Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry
NCT04592367 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction: A Prospective Comparative Study
NCT07086417 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bridge-Enhanced ACL Repair vs ACL Reconstruction
NCT02664545 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA