Esthetic and Clinical Assessment of Injectable Resin Composite Technique
NCT05945758 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2023-07-14
Summary
injectable resin composite technique will show a better clinical and esthetic performance compared to conventional layering resin composite technique in patients with multiple spacing in the maxillary anterior teeth area or not.
Conditions
- Clinical Performance
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Injectable resin composite technique.
A metal impression tray was filled with transparent vinyl polysiloxane (EXACLEAR, GC) and used to copy the stone model with the wax-up. Then, the replica will be separated from metal tray and a needle-shaped bur will be used to drill holes through the silicone key ending in the middle of the incisal edge. It will be checked whether the holes were large enough to enable the tip of the composite syringe to pass easily and completely. Neighbouring teeth (mesial and distal one) isolated using Teflon tape, as each tooth will individually be restored for establishment of satisfactory contact points. Following etching and rinsing, the tooth dried, and a dental cord (Ultrampak, Ultradent) will be packed into sulcus for mechanical prevention of subgingival composite flow. Then, the transparent silicone index will be placed in the correct intraoral position, and a syringe filled with flowable composite will be inserted through the hole on the incisal edge.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional layering technique
the palatal surface will be restored by enamel shade; adapted on the index in the spacing area then The Unica matrix (Polydentia) will be used to restore the proximal wall, and to achieve a good seal with the palatal wall. The matrix can be stabilized with a wedge if necessary. Building the proximal wall using the enamel shade, and the incisal halo by using a dentin shade, the frame to layer the core of the restoration will be ready.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2023-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2025-10-31
- Completion
- 2025-12-31
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Evaluation of Giomer Based Injectable Resin Composite Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Carious Cavities Over 18-months.
NCT05389163 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pre-heated Resin Composite Restoration
NCT05289479 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Volumetric Changes Following Single Pontic Site Development Using Multilayered Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Connective Tissue Grafting in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT06926452 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of High Viscosity Bioactive Injectable Composite in Deep Marginal Elevation
NCT06875544 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Versus Self-Adhesive Resin Composite Restorative Systems
NCT06543680 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Placement in Horizontally Deficient Maxillary Aesthetic Zone With Simultaneous Soft Tissue Augmentation
NCT05274256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Restorations in Cervical Carious Teeth (1y Randomized Clinical Trial)
NCT06185881 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hard and Soft Tissue Changes Following Vestibular Socket Preservation Versus Ice Cream Cone Technique for Management of Defective Fresh Extraction Sockets
NCT06590168 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bulk-fill With Different Technique Three-year Clinical Performance
NCT05861908 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Monolayer Versus Multilayer Leucocyte-Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) in Interdental Papillary Reconstruction
NCT04091802 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Microneedling For Papillae Reconstruction In Esthetic Zone
NCT06021301 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Evaluation of Pink Esthetic Score
NCT03792425 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Deep Marginal Acquisition With Thermacut Bur Vs. Functional Crown Lengthening in Deep Carious Lesions
NCT06205459 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Computer Guided Placement of Zygomatic Implants in Two Different Approaches
NCT06129695 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Surface Roughness of Heat Cured Acrylic Resin Versus Acrylic Resin With Titanium Dioxide
NCT02950584 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Loading With and Without Connective Tissue Graft
NCT03841851 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Soft Tissue Esthetics Around Immediate Implant Using Dual Zone Therapeutic Concept Versus Buccal Gap Fill to Bone Level
NCT03768297 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Deep Margin Elevation Vs Crown Lengthening
NCT05381298 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Graft Versus Acellular Dermal Matrix in Preservation of Buccal Plate of Bone
NCT06229561 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Evaluation of Socket Preservation Using Autogenous Dentine Graft With Or Without Autologous Fibrin Glue
NCT06027528 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Preservation Using the Ice Cream Cone Technique Versus Spontaneous Healing in Fresh Extraction Sockets.
NCT04013425 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Flowable Composite with Giomer Technology Vs High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations in ART for Cancer Patients
NCT05465369 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
One Year Clinical Evaluation of White Spot Lesions Treated With Newly Introduced Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Comparison to Resin Infiltration in Anterior Teeth Split Mouth Technique
NCT02912741 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Assessment of Occlusal Veneer Restorations Performance in Posterior Teeth
NCT07088029 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Various Bilayer Biomimetic Resin Composite Strategies
NCT07285772 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA