MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between ROLL Versus Magnetic Seed for Preoperative Localization of Non-palpable Breast Lesion by Randomized Clinical Study.

NCT05942118 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 262

Last updated 2025-05-20

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Several localization techniques are now in use for localization of non-palpable breast lesions. Several studies have compared wire guided localization (WGL), which has been for years the gold standard for non-palpable breast lesions' localization, with more modern techniques. Scientific evidence supports the efficacy of the new "wire-free" techniques, which appear to be comparable to the WGL in terms of safe surgical resection, while overcoming limitations associated with logistic difficulties and patient discomfort. There is still limited data in literature on the comparative effectiveness of these modern techniques, and there is no strong evidence that one is superior to the others. In particular, no randomized trials of comparison between ROLL and magnetic seed localization are currently available. The aim of this randomized study is to compare ROLL with magnetic seed to assess their efficacy for non-palpable breast lesions' localization.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Breast conservative surgery

Every patients with non-palpable breast lesion will undergo to conservative breast surgery after lesion's localization

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-05-31
Primary Completion
2026-05-31
Completion
2028-05-31

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05942118 on ClinicalTrials.gov