Comparison of Bipolar Vascular Sealing and Conventional Back-table Dissection

NCT05917054 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 98

Last updated 2023-06-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The usage of vessel sealing devices has been gaining popularity in all surgical specialties. Post-renal transplant drain placement is a common practice among transplant surgeons. However, prolonged drainage accompanied by surgical wound complications and perirenal fluid collections is a frequent complication experienced by the recipients. This study aimed to compare bipolar sealing with conventional back-table dissection in terms of post-renal transplant drainage duration, amount, surgical wound complication, and back-table preparation time.

Conditions

  • Drain Site Complication

Interventions

OTHER

use of bipolar vascular sealing method on the renal allograft at the back-table stage

Ligation of small vessels and lymphatics of the renal graft at the back-table stage prior to transplantation to the recipient is a routine practice in kidney transplantation. Bipolar vascular sealing method will be used for this purpose in Group 1, while the conventional silk-tie method will be used in Group 2.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Istinye University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Eryigit Eren, MD · Istinye University Training and Research Hospital

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-01-01
Primary Completion
2022-12-31
Completion
2023-01-01

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05917054 on ClinicalTrials.gov