Conventional Versus Left Bundle Branch Pacing in TAVI

NCT05895097 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2023-06-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomized study compares the effects of conventional (right ventricular pacing in patients with LVEF ≥ 40% and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with LVEF \< 40 %) versus left bundle branch pacing on left ventricular remodelling in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (\< 50 %) that need permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Conditions

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Heart Failure
  • Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Interventions

DEVICE

Left bundle branch pacemaker

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) will be the pacing technique. In brief, after localizing the His bundle area the LBBP lead will be positioned approximately 1-1.5 cm distal to the His bundle position in the right ventricular septum. Before screwing the lead deep into the interventricular septum, the suitable position will be confirmed by fluoroscopic signs and adequate paced QSR morphology. Final lead position will be confirmed according to ECG parameters. Given that the pacing parameters with LBBP are typically low and stable, backup RV lead will not be mandatory.

DEVICE

Conventional pacing

Right ventricular pacing in patients with LVEF ≥ 40% and cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with LVEF \< 40 %

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Medical Centre Ljubljana

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-06-15
Primary Completion
2025-06-15
Completion
2026-06-15

Countries

  • Slovenia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05895097 on ClinicalTrials.gov