MedTrace Logo

A Comparison Study of the Perclose Proglide (TM) SMC System Versus Figure-of-8- Suture Technique for Closure of Large-bore Femoral Venous Access.

NCT05859503 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 200

Last updated 2023-05-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of two strategies for closing large caliber venous access in patients undergoing percutaneous procedures: compression with figure-of-8 suture versus closure with the Perclose-Proglide system.

Conditions

Interventions

OTHER

Closure Strategy with Perclose-Proglide system

Patients who have required Perclose-Proglide system in Percutaneous Interventional Procedure

OTHER

Closure Strategy with figure-of-8

Patients who have required the manual compression with figure-of-8 in Percutaneous Interventional Procedure

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-05-16
Primary Completion
2023-09-01
Completion
2023-09-01

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05859503 on ClinicalTrials.gov