MedTrace Logo

Arthroscopic Assisted CC Stabilization Alone VS Additional K-wire Fixation for Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Injury

NCT05844098 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20

Last updated 2024-10-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This RCT study is designed for comparing functional outcomes and radioligic outcomes between intervention group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation with additional K-wire fixation) and control group (Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilzation alone) for acute ACJI.

The main question it aims to answer is:

\- Does Arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization with additional K-wire fixation provide different outcomes in functional outcomes, CC-distance and GACA difference compare with arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization alone in acute acromioclavicular joint injury?

Conditions

  • Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

Interventions

DEVICE

K-wire

K-wire No. 2.0 insertion was done additionally from arthroscopic assisted CC-stabilization by inserting K-wire from acromion process to distal clavicle.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital, Thailand

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Nachapong Sithiwichankit, MD · QSMVH

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
45 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-04-01
Primary Completion
2024-10-30
Completion
2024-12-30

Countries

  • Thailand

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05844098 on ClinicalTrials.gov