MedTrace Logo

Latarjet Procedure: Comparative Outcomes Study of Arthroscopic Versus Mini-open Approach With Minimum 2-year Follow-up

NCT02505932 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 58

Last updated 2015-07-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To date, use of arthroscopic procedure to perform Latarjet procedure is still technically demanding. The benefits of arthroscopic procedure need to be evaluated compared to the mini-invasive approach. The aim of this study was to assess postoperative pain during the first week, and the positioning of coracoid bone block at the anterior aspect of the glenoid. At minimum 2 years follow-up, the recurrence of shoulder instability and functional evaluation of patients according to the Western Ontario Score Index (WOSI) were assessed.

Conditions

  • Joint Instability

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure

arthroscopic approach (set Depuy-Mitek, Raynham, MA)

PROCEDURE

Mini-open Latarjet procedure

mini-open approach (set Arthrex, Naples, FL)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hospital Ambroise Paré Paris

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Shahnaz Klouche, MD · Hospital Ambroise Paré Paris

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-01-31
Primary Completion
2014-01-31
Completion
2014-12-31

Countries

  • France

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02505932 on ClinicalTrials.gov