MedTrace Logo

Comparison KS Versus TS

NCT05843981 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 42

Last updated 2024-02-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of two different implant systems with different implant-abutment connection: Osstem TS III (control group) versus Osstem KS (study group).

Conditions

  • Dental Implant
  • Dental Implant-Abutment Design

Interventions

DEVICE

Implant placement TS III

Implant placement in subjects who have lost at least two teeth and need a prosthetic implant rehabilitation with TSIII Implant. . After osseointegration, dental implants will receive definitive prosthesis.

DEVICE

Implant placement ks

Implant placement in subjects who have lost at least two teeth and need a prosthetic implant rehabilitation with KS Implant. After osseointegration, dental implants will receive definitive prosthesis.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Melodia, Dario, M.D.

    collaborator INDIV

  • Pisano, Milena, M.D.

    collaborator INDIV

  • Dr. Aurea Lumbau

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Prof. Silvio Mario Meloni

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Prof. Edoardo Baldoni

    collaborator UNKNOWN

  • Università degli Studi di Sassari

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-03-01
Primary Completion
2024-12-31
Completion
2028-01-31

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05843981 on ClinicalTrials.gov