MedTrace Logo

Erector Spinae Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Replacement

NCT05796804 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 64

Last updated 2024-07-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

THR (Total Hip Replacement) can be very painful and regional anesthesia is very effective in reducing postoperative pain. Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and PENG (pericapsular nerve group block) are alternative approaches to the hip sensitive nerve branches that resulted to be very promising for hip surgeries. However, no studies investigated the analgesic superiority of either PENG or ESPB. In our study the investigators compare PENG (with a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block) and ESPB in terms of pain relief expressed as morphine consumption in the first 24 hours after primary THR.

Conditions

  • Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

PROCEDURE

ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK

ULTRASOUND GUIDED - ROPIVACAINE 30 ml 0.5%

PROCEDURE

Peng block + lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block

ULTRASOUND GUIDED - ROPIVACAINE 20 ml 0.5% + 10 ml 0.5%

PROCEDURE

spinal anesthesia

bupivacaine 0.5% 2.2 ml

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-04-13
Primary Completion
2024-02-23
Completion
2024-05-23

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05796804 on ClinicalTrials.gov