Normal Saline Versus Heparin Intermittent Flushing for the Prevention of Occlusion in Port-a-Cath

NCT05707936 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 192

Last updated 2023-02-01

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Purpose:

An evidence implementation of a randomized controlled trial for whether there is the difference in intermittent flushing 0.9% normal saline and heparin? Design: a single-blind randomized controlled trial

Method:

This study is based on the 5A (Ask, Acquire, Appraise, Apply, Audit) of evidence health care step, and design randomized controlled trial for evidence implementation.

We will include inpatients over 20 years-old adults in New Taipei City TuCheng Hospital, Taiwan, who need administration medicine by port-a-catcher. The sample size is 192 according to G-power software. Random allocation software has using for block randomization, would assign to group A: flushing with 0.9% normal saline 10ml, group B: flushing with 0.9% normal saline 20ml, and group C: flushing with heparin 100 USP/ml. SPSS 20.0 software for statistical analysis, mean or standard deviation, one- way ANOVA would use.

Conditions

  • Port-a-cath Occlusion
  • Normal Saline
  • Heparin Lock

Interventions

DRUG

Normal Saline Flush 20 ml

Normal Saline Flush 20 ml

DRUG

Normal Saline Flush 10 ml

Normal Saline Flush 10 ml

DRUG

Heparin Flush (1000 USP, 10ml)

Heparin Flush (1000 USP, 10ml)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-02-01
Primary Completion
2023-09-01
Completion
2023-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05707936 on ClinicalTrials.gov