MedTrace Logo

Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape, MBR, and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in GJL Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study

NCT05698446 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 114

Last updated 2025-04-11

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI. BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability. However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma. In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.

Conditions

  • Ankle Sprains
  • Hypermobility Syndrome

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation

Patients with CLAI and GJL will accept the Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation

PROCEDURE

Anatomic reconstruction operation

Anatomic reconstruction operation

PROCEDURE

Open Modified Broström procedure

Open Modified Broström-Gould surgery

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Peking University Third Hospital

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-11-01
Primary Completion
2025-06-01
Completion
2025-06-01

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05698446 on ClinicalTrials.gov