MedTrace Logo

Reattachment of the SPR Versus the Bone Block Procedure for Recurrent Peroneal Tendon Dislocation

NCT04955665 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 47

Last updated 2021-07-09

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Clinical outcomes between reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum (SPR) and the bone block procedure were compared in this study to elucidate which procedure was safer and more effective.

Conditions

  • Recurrent Peroneal Tendon Dislocation

Interventions

PROCEDURE

bone block procedure

a 20 × 15 × 3 mm3 bone block was cut from the lateral malleolus, rotated backwards 45°, and sutured back to the periosteum of the lateral malleolus using non-absorbable sutures.

PROCEDURE

Reattachment of the superior peroneal retinaculum

two suture anchors (Mini Quickanchor,DePuy Mitek) were inserted into the postero-lateral ridge of the lateral malleolus without damaging the cartilaginous ridge, after which the SPR was reattached to the lateral malleolus with the anchored suture. The inner layer of the false pouch was incised, and the outer layer (periosteum) was sutured with the SPR in a pants-over-vest style.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Peking University Third Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Qinwei Guo, MD · Peking University Third Hospital

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-07-01
Primary Completion
2016-12-31
Completion
2018-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04955665 on ClinicalTrials.gov