Intermittent Bolus vs Continuous Infusion Via ESP Catheters RCT

NCT05642416 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 240

Last updated 2026-05-13

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of two different delivery methods for postoperative pain management following cardiac surgery requiring median sternotomy: intermittent programmed LA bolus versus continuous LA infusion through ESP catheters. Effectiveness of analgesia will be assessed based on the subjects' NRS pain scores and opioid consumption. The primary outcome measure will be the patients' opioid consumption over the course of the 72 hours following surgery. Secondary outcomes measures that will be evaluated include NRS pain scores, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and time to first dose of antiemetic in the postoperative period. It is hypothesized that the use of intermittent programmed LA boluses will provide better analgesia compared to continuous LA infusion through ESP catheters. The findings of this study will provide guidance regarding the optimal method of delivery for postoperative pain management in patients following cardiac surgery.

Conditions

  • Post Operative Pain

Interventions

DRUG

Continuous Infusion of ropivacaine

Continuous infusion of ropivacaine

DRUG

Intermittent bolus of ropivacaine

Intermittent bolus of ropivacaine

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Avanos Medical

    collaborator OTHER
  • Henry Ford Health System

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-10-18
Primary Completion
2024-12-23
Completion
2024-12-23
FDA Drug
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05642416 on ClinicalTrials.gov