MedTrace Logo

Assessment of Different Imaging Systems for Dental Plaque Scoring

NCT05612009 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2022-11-10

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between the dental plaque indices measured different imaging systems and conventional clinical indices that assess dental plaque. From among the patients who visited Marmara University, Faculty of Dentistry 30 adults between the age of 18-30, who had under 3 DMFT scores, were selected for full-mouth imaging. Digital dental photography, digital scanning system and fluorecam methods were used for taking intraoral images. The Turesky Modified Quigley Hein Plaque Index (TMQHPI) was scored both by the clinical examination method and on the images taken. The correlations between the clinical examinaton, digital photography, digital scanning system and fluorecam scores were analyzed. Maxillary and mandibulary anterior teeth's buccal surfaces were scored to TMQHPI after using disclosing agent.

Conditions

  • Dental Plaque Imaging Methods

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Toothpastes

Signal Expert Protection: Conventional toothpaste including Sodium Lauryl Sulphate and fluoride. Colgate Hemp Seed Oil: Herbal toothpaste including hemp seed oil and also fluoride. Gumgumix: Herbal toothpaste including ginger extract (no fluoride).

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Marmara University

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
35 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-05-17
Primary Completion
2021-07-02
Completion
2021-08-27
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05612009 on ClinicalTrials.gov