MedTrace Logo

Comparison Between Conventional Angiocatheter Versus New Anchoring Device (KARAHOC) Used for Paracentesis

NCT05578573 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 80

Last updated 2022-10-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Comparison of success rate and complication between conventional angiocatheter versus new anchoring device (KARAHOC) used for paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with ascites.

Conditions

  • Ascites Hepatic

Interventions

DEVICE

KARAHOC device

After leaving a mark on the part where the puncture is to be performed using a pen, sterilization dressing are performed, local anesthesia is performed aseptic then ascites paracentesis by KARAHOC device.

DEVICE

Angiocatheter

After leaving a mark on the part where the puncture is to be performed using a pen, sterilization dressing are performed, local anesthesia is performed aseptic then ascites paracentesis by angiocatheter

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sang Gyune Kim

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Sang gyune Kim, PhD · Soonchunhyang University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
19 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-01-17
Primary Completion
2022-12-31
Completion
2022-12-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05578573 on ClinicalTrials.gov