Wearable Focused Ultrasound Stimulation for Peripheral Nerve Pain Management
NCT07160049 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 15
Last updated 2025-09-08
Summary
This study will evaluate the feasibility of a novel wearable focused ultrasound (FUS) device for peripheral nerve stimulation in healthy volunteers. The aim is to assess device operability, usability, tolerability, and physiological responses during standardized sensory tests. Each participant will complete nine \~1-hour study sessions across multiple days, including cold pressor and algometry tasks performed under baseline, sham, and active FUS conditions.
Conditions
- Pain Management
- Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Cold Pressor Task - Upper Limb
This study uses a three-session cold pressor paradigm to evaluate feasibility of a wearable focused ultrasound (FUS) device for peripheral nerve stimulation. Session 1 (Baseline): After consent, participants immerse the dominant hand in 0-1 °C water (\~10 cm depth) in an insulated bucket. Time to first pain is recorded, with 5 min rests between immersions (12 total; max single immersion 6 min). Water temperature is digitally monitored, with ice added as needed. Session 2 (Sham): The median/ulnar/radial nerve in the dominant forearm is located by ultrasound. The FUS device is applied with hydrogel but set to sham (no output). The cold pressor protocol is repeated. Session 3 (Active FUS): After nerve localization, active FUS (650 kHz, 60-100% intensity, 20-30% duty cycle) is delivered for 5 min. The cold pressor test is repeated to record pain tolerance as an exploratory physiological response during feasibility testing.
- DEVICE
-
Algometry Pain Tests in the Upper Limb
This session records pressure pain thresholds in the dominant hand with a wearable FUS device and a pressure algometer during feasibility testing. Session 1 (Baseline): After consent and briefing, the median, ulnar, and radial nerves at three points on the dominant hand (wrist, palm, finger) are located via ultrasound and marked. A pressure algometer is applied to each site, with pressure gradually increased until pain is first reported. Thresholds are recorded, with each location tested three times with short breaks. Session 2 (Sham): The same nerve sites are identified and marked. The wearable FUS device is applied with hydrogel but set to sham (no active output). The baseline algometry protocol is repeated. Session 3 (Active FUS): Following nerve localization, active FUS (650 kHz, 60-100% intensity, 20-30% duty cycle) is delivered for 5 min. The algometry test is repeated to record pressure pain thresholds as exploratory physiological responses during feasibility testing.
- DEVICE
-
Algometry Pain Tests in the Lower Limb
This session records pressure pain thresholds in the dominant foot with a wearable FUS device and a pressure algometer during feasibility testing. Session 1 (Baseline): After consent and briefing, the tibial, saphenous, and peroneal nerves at three standardized points on the dominant foot are located via ultrasound and marked. A pressure algometer is applied to each site, and pressure is gradually increased until pain is first reported. Thresholds are recorded, with repeated trials and short breaks between tests. Session 2 (Sham): The same nerve sites are identified and marked. The wearable FUS device is applied with hydrogel but set to sham (no active output). The baseline algometry protocol is repeated. Session 3 (Active FUS): Following nerve localization, active FUS (650 kHz, 60-100% intensity, 20-30% duty cycle) is delivered for 5 min. The algometry test is then repeated to record pressure pain thresholds as exploratory physiological responses during feasibility testing.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Texas at Austin
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Huiliang Wang, PhD · University of Texas at Austin
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-07-14
- Primary Completion
- 2025-09-15
- Completion
- 2025-10-15
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Electrotherapies for Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT01658735 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Unmodulated 5 Kilohertz Currents Versus TENS: Effect on Pain Thresholds, Tactile Threshold, and Nerve Conduction
NCT02320838 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cryoneurolysis for Cutaneous Neuropathic Pain
NCT04911569 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ultrasound Needle Transducer for Regional Anesthesia Validation Study
NCT04726930 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Subthreshold Stimulation Versus Suprathreshold Stimulation in People With Chronic Low Neck Pain
NCT06559358 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Acupressure for Fatigue and Low Back Pain
NCT02106741 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ultra-high Frequency (500 KHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain or Lower Limb Pain
NCT03543085 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Interferential Currents in Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT01017913 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Neurophysiological Effects of PENS on Radial Nerve in Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia
NCT04576195 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad on Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02487368 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Ecoguided Percutaneous Neuromodulation of the Multipurpose Musculature of L-3 in Non-specific Chronic Lumbar Pain.
NCT03738748 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Short-term Effects of Exercise Program Versus Electropuncture in Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
NCT03794869 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pain Reducing Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain or Lumbo-radiculalgia
NCT00452010 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Electrical Intra-cutaneous Half-sine Stimulation for Optimized Preferential C-fiber Activation
NCT05440266 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Antalgic Effect of Pulse Frequency and Pad Size of TENS on Blunt Pressure Pain
NCT01999595 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Peripheral Stimulation of Acupuncture Points for Low Back Pain
NCT04809909 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04243915 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Electrotherapy Techniques to Treat Low Back Pain
NCT02297685 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Low Versus High Frequency Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Chronic Neck Pain Patients.
NCT03401905 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficiency of Function-oriented Taping Application in Low Back Pain Patients
NCT06952205 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Use of a Vibration Tool for Postoperative Pain Control in Distal Radius Fractures
NCT05318729 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Different Electrical Frequencies Used in Percutaneous Neuromodulation on Muscle Strength and Pressure Pain Thresholds
NCT07269925 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
EUS-Coeliac Plexus Block Versus Radiofrequency Ablation in Pain Relief of Patients With Malignancy
NCT04809935 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Cryotherapy and TENS on Low Back Pain
NCT03248505 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Acute Effects of Therapeutic Ultrasound on Passive Muscle Stiffness and Pain in Patients With Neck Pain
NCT07203040 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA