Comparison of Laparoscopic Adnexal Mass Extraction Via the Transumbilical and Transvaginal Routes
NCT05421117 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 93
Last updated 2022-06-16
Summary
Adnexal masses are a common clinical problem encountered in gynecological practice. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for ovarian pathologies has been adopted widely. Its goals are to minimize abdominal incisions and postoperative pain and to prevent incisional complications, such as incisional hernias and adhesions. Compared with open procedures, MIS is associated with faster recovery times, better patient quality of life, and lower postoperative complication rates. The removal of an adnexal mass from the abdominal cavity is performed most commonly using the suprapubic, umbilical, or vaginal route. Apart from these, mini laparoscopy can provide a better cosmetic result without additional operative time or complications. Despite the limited use of mini laparoscopy for gynecological procedures, its use has increased recently.
After excision, an adnexal mass can be removed through a laparoscopic (LS) port using a variety of endoscopic or containment bags. After the mass has been placed in it, the bag is withdrawn, closed, and expelled through the skin incision with simultaneous trocar removal. When a mass is large or cannot be removed through the port, the incision may be enlarged slightly. This situation may yield a cosmetically worse outcome and increases the risk of postoperative complications, such as adhesion, hernia, and increased postoperative pain. Thus, natural orifice surgery (NOS) has emerged for tissue removal in such cases.
This study was performed to compare the transumbilical (TU) and transvaginal (TV) routes for adnexal mass removal from the abdominal cavity
Conditions
- Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic adnexal mass extraction
Compared with open procedures, Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with faster recovery times, better patient quality of life, and lower postoperative complication rates. The removal of an adnexal mass from the abdominal cavity is performed most commonly using the suprapubic, trans umbilical (TU), or trans vaginal (TV) route.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Erzincan Military Hospital
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2020-12-31
- Completion
- 2020-12-31
More Related Trials
-
Transumbilical Versus Transvaginal Specimen Retrieval at Minilaparoscopy
NCT01418807 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
The Effect of Laparoscopic Surgery on Ovarian Reserve According to Cyst Types
NCT05054946 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Uterine Closure Techniques on the Cesarean Scar Thickness After Repeated Cesarean Section
NCT03644433 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Does Vnotes Salpingectomy Reduce Ovarian Reserve?
NCT07177144 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Minilap Hysterectomy
NCT03251677 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Laparoendoscopic Single Site Adnexal Surgery for Benign Ovarian and Tubal Disease
NCT01679509 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Uterine and Ovarian Vessel Occlusion on Blood Loss in High Burden Minimally Invasive Myomectomy.
NCT07182045 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Does Preventive Uterine Artery Occlusion During Laparoscopic Myomectomy Impact on Ovarian Reserve Markers?
NCT02563392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transverse vs Longitudinal Incision in Myomectomy
NCT03009812 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Uterine Cavity After Operative Hysteroscopy
NCT06924437 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
A Clinical Study on the Feasibility and Safety of Abdominal Endoscopic Single-port Surgery System to Assist Gynecological Day Surgery
NCT06828419 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Analgesic Efficacy of Plan Blocks in Laparoscopic Hysterectomies
NCT05925972 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Women's Sexual Quality of Life After Benign Adnexal Surgery Using vNOTES Approach
NCT05761275 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Benefits of Laparoscopy by Single Port Access for Adnexal Surgery
NCT02739724 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Laparoscopy in Assessing Resectability of Ovarian Cancer
NCT05564234 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasability Study of Removing the Ovaries and Fallopian Tubes
NCT01566955 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Preoperative Rectus Sheath Block on Quality of Recovery in Single Port Laparoscopic Adnexal Surgery
NCT05984212 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Measurement of Fibroid Volume and 2D, 3D US
NCT02638688 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Myomectomy Operation and Fundus Incision, Energy Modalities and Methods of Extraction
NCT03901404 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Enclosed Morcellation; Electromechanic Morcellation vs Vaginal Removal
NCT02737553 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Different Physiotherapy Methods Applied After Gynecological Abdominal Surgery on Postoperative Symptoms
NCT06965595 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Pre Operative Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
NCT01075074 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Cesarean Scar After Three Different Uterine Closure Technis
NCT03915847 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve
NCT02284711 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Implementation of MinimAlly Invasive Hysterectomy Trial
NCT03617354 ·Status: COMPLETED