MedTrace Logo

Comparing Relative Motion Splint With Static Splint After Hand Extensor Tendon Repair

NCT05413031 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 26

Last updated 2022-06-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Different splints are used after hand extensor tendon repair (including relative motion splint, static splint, etc.) There is no consensus regarding the benefits of either one.

The aim of this study is to compare clinical outcomes after using different orthoses and rehabilitation methods after hand extensor tendon repair.

Patients are randomly assigned after signing consent to either immobilization with a static splint or a relative motion splint. Patients are examined after 2 and 5 months postoperatively for finger range of motion, grip strength, and DASH questionnaire.

Conditions

  • Hand Tendon Injury

Interventions

DEVICE

relative motion splint

splint with ability to move the fingers

DEVICE

static splint

splint with immobility of wrist, and fingers

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Rambam Health Care Campus

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-01-30
Primary Completion
2021-02-27
Completion
2021-03-30

Countries

  • Israel

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05413031 on ClinicalTrials.gov