MedTrace Logo

Passive Mobilization With Place and Hold vs Active Mobilization Therapy After Flexor Tendon Repair

NCT04385485 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 64

Last updated 2024-01-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate if active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair in fingers gives better range of motion, strength, risk of rupture and patient satisfaction compared with passive mobilisation with place and hold after flexor tenon repair.

Conditions

  • Tendon Injury - Hand

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Active mobilisation

We investigate if active mobilisation is as good as passive mobilisation with place and hold after flexor tendon suture.

PROCEDURE

Passive mobilisation with place and hold

We investigate if active mobilisation is as good as passive mobilisation with place and hold after flexor tendon suture.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jan Fridén, Professor · Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
16 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-07-14
Primary Completion
2018-08-30
Completion
2023-01-16

Countries

  • Sweden

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04385485 on ClinicalTrials.gov