Conventional vs Bipolar SIJ RFA for Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain
NCT05409443 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 116
Last updated 2024-05-14
Summary
Specific Aims The sacroiliac joint complex (SIJC) is a diathrodial, synovial joint and posterior ligamentous network that receives both anterior innervation from the lumbosacral plexus as well as posterior sensory innervation via the posterior sacral network (PSN). The PSN is comprised by the lateral branches S1-S3 posterior rami, with variable contributions from S4 lateral branch, L4 medial branch, and L5 dorsal ramus. Pain signals originating from the SIJC can be interrupted with image-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the PSN, thereby reducing pain and disability in carefully selected patients.
A prior systematic review estimated that 32-89% of patients achieve at least 50% pain relief for six months after some type of PSN ablation. Many experts suspect that heterogenous RFA techniques and technology are responsible for the variable success rates seen across published studies. Cadaveric work suggests that targeting the PSN with a large bipolar strip lesions would result in \>95% PSN neural capture compared to a smaller lesion produced by a conventional, monopolar, periforaminal RFA technique which may capture as low as 2.5% of the PSN. Nimbus is a commonly used multi-tined RFA probe whose large bipolar lesion size make it an ideal option for complete PSN neural ablation. Both the Nimbus (N-SIJRFA) and conventional (C-SIJRFA) techniques and technologies are commonly used; however, there are no prospective RCT's comparing them, and the clinical significance remains unknown.
Problem: There are no randomized controlled trials comparing novel technologies like N-SIJRFA to C-SIJRFA.
Purpose: To compare pain and disability outcomes in patients with confirmed SIJC pain after randomization to either N-SIJRFA or C-SIJRFA.
Central Hypothesis: N-SIJRFA will be more effective in improving pain and function compared to patients treated with C-SIJRFA at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
Specific Aims:
1. Compare the proportion of participants who report ≥50% relief of pain by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) after N-SIJRFA versus C-SIJRFA.
2. Compare the proportion of participants who report ≥15-point ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) reduction after N-SIJRFA versus C-SIJRFA.
3. Compare the proportion of participants with clinically significant improvement in the categorical EuroQol 5 Dimensions tool (EQ-5D) defined by ≥0.03, after N-SIJRFA versus C-SIJRFA.
4. Compare the proportions of participants who report being "improved" or "much improved" on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale after N-SIJRFA versus C-SIJRFA.
5. Evaluate the differences in success rates for pain improvement, functional improvement and satisfaction in those experiencing ≥ 50%, ≥ 80%, and 100% pain relief after either prognostic PSN blocks or intra-articular (IA) sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injections.
6. Determine the effect of PSN ablation on reducing pain related sleep disturbance as measured by the Pain and Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ-3).
7. Compare procedural time requirements between those treated with N-SIJRFA versus C-SIJRFA.
8. Report adverse effects.
9. Report rates of subsequent interventional healthcare utilization including repeat N-SIJRFA versus C-SIJRFA, SIJ injection, and SIJ fusion.
Conditions
- Sacroiliac Joint Complex
- Low Back Pain
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Nimbus Sacroiliac Joint Radiofrequency Ablation (N-SIJRFA)
* Electrodes are positioned along the lateral sacral crest lateral to the inflection points of the S1, S2 and S3 lateral foraminal walls along first to third transverse sacral tubercles maintaining a craniocaudal line with an interelectrode distance of no more than 15mm. * The appropriate locations are confirmed in both AP and lateral views and the tines are deployed. Following injection of lidocaine, lesions are performed at 85 degrees Celsius for 180 seconds at each site for bipolar sites and 80 degrees Celsius for 90 seconds for the monopolar site. Following ablation, the tines are retracted for all electrodes prior to removal.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional Sacroiliac Joint Radiofrequency Ablation (C-SIJRFA)
* To target the L4 medial branch and L5 dorsal ramus, an electrode will be placed in parallel between the junction of the L5 transverse process and superior articular process and the sacral ala and S1 superior articular process. * A periforaminal electrode position will be used to target the lateral branches from S1 to S3. An 22-G cannula with a 5-mm exposed tip will be directed to a location approximately 3-5mm lateral to the PSFA of S1, S2, and S3. The "analog clock" positions for the probes at S1 and S2 levels will be 1:00, 3:00, and 5:30 on the right, and 6:30, 9:00, and 11:00 on the left. For the S3 level the positions at 1:30 and 4:30 on the right, and 7:30 and 10:30 on the left will be used (6,18). * The appropriate locations are confirmed in both AP and lateral views. Following injection of lidocaine, monopolar RFA is performed for 90 seconds at 80 degrees Celsius at each location.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Stratus Medical, INC
collaborator UNKNOWN - lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-08-15
- Primary Completion
- 2026-08-30
- Completion
- 2027-06-30
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Lateral Branch Cooled Radiofrequency Denervation vs. Conservative Therapy for Sacroiliac Joint Pain
NCT03601949 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Medial Branch Nerves for theTreatment of Lumbar Facet Syndrome
NCT02478437 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Placebo-Controlled Study Assessing Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Denervation for Sacroiliac (SI) Joint Pain
NCT00373724 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cooled RF Lesion MRI Characteristics
NCT03631030 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Combined Continuous and Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation for Pain Relief and Their Safety in Cervical Facet Pain
NCT05719948 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial Assessing Cooled Radiofrequency Denervation as a Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Using the Sinergy System
NCT00802997 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cryoneurolysis for Facet Mediated Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT06016127 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Ultrasound Guided Platelet Rich Plasma Injections in the Sacroiliac Joint
NCT03122119 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Pulsed vs Continuous Radiofrequency Neurotomy for Cervical Facet Joint Mediated Pain
NCT04124445 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trident Multi-tined Cannula for Cervical MBRFA Compared to the Conventional Cannula
NCT05424198 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Retrolaminar and Medial Branch Block in Cervical Facet Joint Arthropathy
NCT05184881 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
RFN for SIJ Disease Study
NCT01726608 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Technical Description of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation of Lumbar Medial Branches for the Treatment of Lumbar Facet Pain
NCT01590004 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain Using Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Versus Steroid/Anesthetic
NCT05121961 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Radiofrequency-treatment on Patients With Facet-joint Pain in Cervical- and Lumbar-columna
NCT00476684 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Plus Superficial Cervical Plexus Block in Treatment of Cervical Spondylosis Pain
NCT06480175 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of the Temperature Used in Thermal Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT02148003 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraarticular Lumbar Joint Corticosteroid Injection(s) as a Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain in a Selected Population
NCT01382771 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Trial Comparing Treatment With SInergy™ System to Conservative Treatment for Chronic Sacroiliac Joint Pain
NCT01158092 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
RFD Versus Cervical Medial Branch Blocks in Chronic Degenerative Neck Pain
NCT01743326 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Technical Efficacy of a Direction Specific Radiofrequency Device in the Performance of Lumbar Medial Branch Neurotomies
NCT02120625 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Imaging for SIJ Injection Therapy
NCT03992053 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
CRF vs WCRF or PRF-DRG in CLBP of FJ Origin and RFA Failure of MBDR: Central Sensitization and Aberrant Nerve Sprouting
NCT04542798 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Non-Invasive Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain
NCT06185816 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
RFp on Suprascapular N. Versus RFp on Suprascapular N. and Circumflex in the Treatment of Painful Shoulder
NCT03498976 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA